Cyclic Character of Modern Economic Development

Important appropriateness of  development of modern economy is its cycled  character. Puriny every structural crisis of the world economy new opportunities are formed. Capital of the countries, which were leaders during last cycle, is being devaluated. Qualification  of lab our forces in field using old technologies are being ruined, while the countries, which managed to create innovational potential proved to be in the center of attracting capital which is independent from the old production. Consequently, the countries that implemented  scientific-technical and industrial capital investment policy in prospective fields will be given a competitive advantage. The realization of  this policy in the phase  of structural crisis gives its authors the opportunity to achieve  economic growth on the  basis of competitive advantage.

 

Basic scientific and radical innovations are recognized as the main means of overcoming structural crisis, that are implement thought acquiring new achievements and rising the effectiveness of traditional development .

 

In order to move to the stable stage of economic develop it’s important to increase innovational-investment act vitas and to involve new technological directions and basic technologies at trajectory  of firm economic development. The economic policy that is oriented at encouraging  investment, in innovations provide modernization of economy, also gives rise to its competitiveness.

 

Innovative way of development in investment policy. Thus, the main importance is given to the innovative type of development, that implies the growth of government role in exercising investment policy. Highly development countries. Take the responsibility of financing fields like fundamental  science and high-risk research, as well as the development of scientific research infrastructure. Spreading new ideas and educating population. The implementation of this functions takes place against the background of high-scale investments. that creates favorable conditions  for production growth on the basis of scientific innovations.

 

Currently, the government tries to develop institutions that will support vestment in new  technologies, stimulate innovative activities, encourage progressive technological changes, that unities financial tab our and informational recourses.

 

Currently government  tries to create development institutions , which will support investments in new technologies, stimulate innovative activities, encourage progressive technological changes, that unites financial, lab our and informational resources. The state may avoid the responsibility of developing   the production activities , where special markets and competitive relations are formed. At the same time it must encourage new, high-risk directions of investment activities, that pave the way to creating production on the   basis introducing scientific and technical achievements.

 

For example the wave of economic regulations that spread from developing countries in the late 8 th lost century covered the traditional branches of economy but it had no connection with high-technological sector, conversely the importance of direct state support institutions for innovation activities were risen. At the same time, the importance of working out state strategy for scientist technical and social economic development grows. The state aims at creating enterprises , that will manage to gain com putative advantage over the companies of inner and foreign markets. They  must consentrate their resourses on prospective  fields of production.

 

The direct instruments of state influence are oriented at supporting  private initiatives and innovative enterprises that will stimulate investment activities in certain fields and production initiatives.

 

The necessity of financing science and its current condition:

 

Active investment process, especially in scientific and technological fields, innovative and scientific-technical activities lays in the foundation for economic growth. Nowadays the decline in scientific technical potential is caused by  the fact that there is no more unity between scientific researches and their usage  former. scientific staff has been dismantled  and number of intellectuals have left the country.

 

Consequently, the country becomes more dependent on foreign trader.

 

So, in order to create favorable conditions for economic growth capital renewal is essential, but it’s very complicated, because of  the decrease in state financing and absence of ordering production, Science and education have no inner resources for development.

 

During the last few years there has been significant  reduction of scientific and educational research expenditures. As a result, the share of expenditures in GWP spent on science in 1999 amounted to 0,97%, which is twice less than in 1990. In 2006, the expenses spent on educational field amounted to only 1,5% of the GWP, which is the lowest index among the transitional countries.

 

Significant reduction of company’s demand on innovations resulted in increase of financing Scientific field from the state budget. Budgetary expenditures on scientific-research and construction work have been absolutely reduced and they are tend to decline against the GWP as veil as the budgetary share of the expenses. The degradation of Scientific potential is proved by sharp decline in expenditures used in research and construction work pond it resulted in dropping behind highly developed countries. Expenditures on Scientific research in the USA (1998) amounted to 794% per person, in Japan